Skip to content
Notes from the field

Notes from the field

How a Pioneer of Machine Learning Became One of Its Sharpest Critics

How a Pioneer of Machine Learning Became One of Its Sharpest Critics

A future of truly intelligent machines requires causal reasoning, not simply "nontrivial curve fitting" (the probabilistic association of cause and effect), argues Judea Pearl. Development of true reasoning – why a given action has a certain outcome, not just that they're correlated – would allow machines to "ask counterfactual questions" – in effect, to predict how a change creates a likely outcome that has never been seen before – and potentially even develop agency and free will. He puts lack of progress in this area down to a missing "calculus for asymmetrical relations" (knowing that the sun causes the grass to grow and not vice versa).
https://rob.al/2spHg18
Judea Pearl helped artificial intelligence gain a strong grasp on probability, but laments that it still can’t compute cause and effect.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
2018-05-31

linkedin cross-post

Post navigation

PREVIOUS
The Apple Watch has found a surprisingly useful home
NEXT
AI and Compute
Comments are closed.

Archives

The standard disclaimer…

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in the text belong solely to the me, and not necessarily to the my employer, organization, committee or other group that I belong to or am associated with.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
© 2023 Rob Aleck, licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0
Go to mobile version